The Problem With AI Theater
A lot of what gets called AI strategy is performance. Here is what it costs and why it keeps happening.
There is growing noise about AI replacing white-collar work outright. The deeper pattern is different: work changes shape, but core accountability stays human.
Someone Has to Buy the Product
AI does not erase the need for buyers, operators, and decision-makers. It compresses low-leverage execution and shifts people toward judgment-heavy work.
When applied well, AI removes friction from gathering and preparing information so teams can focus on analysis, decisions, and outcomes.
Why the Noise Exists
Frontier model companies are competing for adoption, enterprise contracts, and mindshare. Aggressive replacement narratives create urgency, and urgency accelerates adoption.
That incentive structure matters when organizations interpret forecasts. Fear-based adoption often produces expensive activity without meaningful system outcomes.
What AI Theater Looks Like
AI theater is performative adoption: visible signals without operational substance.
It looks like a chatbot installed for optics, internal prompt libraries with no workflow integration, or initiative decks with no production implementation.
The cost is not just tooling spend. It is lost credibility, lost time, and teams burned by initiatives that never convert to outcomes.
What the Alternative Looks Like
Start with one measurable outcome, not a vague mandate to use AI everywhere.
Build the smallest production system that can achieve that outcome. Instrument it, measure it, and iterate.
That is applied AI infrastructure, not theater.
David Valencia is a full stack developer and systems thinker focused on applied AI systems and LLM discoverability. He works with organizations that want AI to produce outcomes, not just outputs. Minnesota.AI
Want Applied AI Instead of AI Theater?
If you want AI tied to measurable business outcomes, we can scope a focused system and ship it with instrumentation.
Book a Discovery Call